The appearance of the Epic Games Store (hereinafter EGS) excited the gaming industry. This store literally became one of the most hotly debated topics in 2019. However, could it be otherwise?? After all, it’s not often that there’s a daredevil ready to challenge Steam, the almost unconditional monopolist in the PC gaming market. There’s just one nuance – in the six months of its existence, EGS managed to arouse hatred among a significant part of the gaming community, and the policies of its leadership became the object of criticism and censure. Why did this happen? How justified is such an attitude?? Where it all started? Let’s figure it out!
In the beginning there was Fortnite.
And it was announced back in 2011. For some time this cooperative survival simulator aroused my interest, but, unfortunately, development was very delayed. The game was released only in 2017, when its concept, to put it mildly, began to look secondary and mediocre.
It would seem that this is where the story should have come to an end, without really having time to really begin, but PlayerUnknown’s Battlegrounds intervened. Seeing how wildly popular this battle royale is, Epic Games decided to make their own. But they did not have time for full-fledged development, because in a few years this trend could easily fade away. And here Fortnite came in handy.
Interesting fact: The creators of PUBG did not appreciate this step and filed a lawsuit against Epic Games, but six months later the lawsuit was withdrawn. There are rumors that the intervention of the Chinese company Tencent, which owns shares of both sides, led to a peaceful resolution of the conflict.
The glory of Fortnite: Battle Royale easily eclipsed the very existence of its predecessor. Epic Games has found a real goldmine! No one could have predicted how successful this idea would be. Like how long it might last. A month, a year, maybe a decade? Epic Games showed amazing foresight (by the standards of most companies) in deciding to use the funds they received to create something that would bring them even greater profits in the long run. This is how the plan to create your own digital distribution store emerged – Epic Games Store.
In Gabe’s Shadow.
But there is already a leader in this market – Steam. Valve’s policy is passive, entirely subject to the principle of "don’t fix what isn’t broken", but this does not make them easy prey. Steam boasts a huge selection, excellent pricing, unique features, and an army of dedicated gamers from all over the world. How to compete with such a giant? You could write an entire dissertation about this, but still not come to any clear answer.
It is not surprising that Epic Games decided to approach this problem from a different angle, focusing its efforts on luring publishers and developers. They offered a larger percentage of the proceeds, simultaneously accusing Valve of greed. And this strategy turned out to be quite effective. Thus, some games turned out to be temporary EGS exclusives.
But more on that later. Now I would like to emphasize the following: by directing the main efforts to publishers and developers, Epic Games neglected the interests of the players. Their store is objectively inferior to Steam in terms of the number of functions, which is clearly demonstrated in the table below:
There’s not even a banal basket there! During the sale, some users were banned for purchasing multiple games because the bot found their behavior too suspicious! Great service, isn’t it??
Of course, Epic has already promised to add the necessary functions in the future, but one question remains: why did they release EGS in such a raw form?? I think the culprit is haste. Epic Games wants to promote EGS while they are at the peak of their capabilities, which in turn directly depends on the success of Fortnite. As I said earlier, no one knows how long this golden time will last.
However, there are also external factors that could hasten the end of the Fortnite era: in early May, US Senator Josh Hawley proposed banning loot boxes and microtransactions in video games played by children. If such a bill manages to overcome the resistance of the video game lobby, the changes will shake up the entire industry. As for Fortnite, it will simply lose its monetization model, and this will be even worse for the game than losing popularity.
The day hate was born.
Now back to the topic of temporary exclusivity. Let’s start with a little background: for many years, exclusivity meant only one thing for PC players – good games that they could not play due to the commercial interests of large companies. This state of affairs has given the term an extremely negative connotation. What did Epic decide to do about it?? They used the term temporary exclusivity because it is more tolerant. Sounds logical?
But logic is not equivalent to correctness. Regardless of the theory, the implementation of this policy led to enormous reputational damage for EGS. On January 28, 2019, thunder struck – Metro Exodus became a temporary exclusive to the Epic Games Store. And this caused a whole storm of indignation from the players, since pre-orders on Steam were canceled without their knowledge. EGS literally invaded these people’s comfort zone, which in my opinion was a huge mistake.
Interesting fact: As a sign of protest, Steam users used “dislike bombardment”, lowering the approval ratings of projects associated with companies that went to EGS. The situation was so serious that Valve introduced a mechanism to prevent this practice.
Then everything went on and on. There were more and more temporary exclusives in EGS, which, in turn, led to growing dissatisfaction with the policies of Epic Games. Was there anything good in this situation?? Yes, Epics ensured the porting of hits from Quantic Dream to personal computers. But this alone was not enough to change anger to mercy.
Interesting fact: Reddit users suspected Epic Games of spying on players. Valve also showed interest, because the store from Epic also climbed into Steam files! God bless Reddit!
"Built on Bones".
Unfortunately, statistics on the state of affairs of EGS cannot be found in the public domain. Usually the wording about sales in it sounds like “a lot”. How much is it really? Maybe “many” means fifty copies? Or fifty thousand? Or five hundred thousand? Maybe five million? I don’t know, and this is a problem, because I simply don’t have indicators for analysis. But we still need to talk about the financial side of the issue. Just keep in mind that what follows is just my guess.
Let’s start with the fact that Epic Games spends a huge amount of money on promoting its store. Judge for yourself: a lot of exclusives, distribution of free games, advertising, sales with a very generous offer to buy at a discount even something that has not yet been released… This all requires money. A lot of money.
Interesting fact: During the Epic Mega Sale, some publishers removed their games from the store. Why? ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ No one gave a comprehensive answer.
And Fortnite gives it to them. But… Is it really that simple?? How Fortnite has managed to remain a cash cow for a year and a half now? Through the ruthless exploitation of its employees! Thanks to Polygon for this news:
https://www.polygon.com/2019/4/23/18507750/fortnite-work-crunch-epic-games
Briefly about the contents of the article:
"One senior guy would say, ‘Just get more bodies.’".
“I’ve had friends break down in tears” / “I had friends who couldn’t stand it and started crying”.
“It got really scary. No one was safe" / "It became really scary. Nobody felt safe".
“One day they might stand up and walk out and we’d never see them again” / “One day they might just stand up and walk out, and we’ll never see them again”.
"It’s killing people. Something has to change" / "This is killing people. Something has to change".
I would like to apologize in advance for the clumsiness of the translation.
Employees report a ‘culture of fear’ https://katiesbingocasino.co.uk/games/ within the company. Of course, Epic Games themselves claim that they do not force anyone to work 70-100 hours a week and do their best to combat overtime… But if you cannot cope with your workload, then your contract will not be renewed. In addition, additional psychological pressure is put on employees, because the work that one person refuses to do will fall on the shoulders of others. What’s the result?? Fortnite’s popularity is supported by the suffering of dozens of developers! You know, every day it begins to seem to me more and more that we are living in some kind of absolutely insane dystopia.
What did we learn today? First, Epic Games are enriching themselves through the barbaric exploitation of Fortnite developers. And that in itself is terrible. Secondly, Epic Games decided to compete with Valve by luring publishers and developers, imposing on players a service that is objectively inferior to Steam in many respects. Thirdly, EGS continues to pursue policies that cause an extremely negative reaction among a significant part of the gaming community. Well, let the conclusions be yours. Thank you for your attention!
Best comments
All of the above is done to protect against accounts that send spam, cheat, and so on.
If a person uses Steam normally, then all this is not a problem.
So these are manifestations of real competition. No violations or deceptions. Moreover, this is not something innovative, but a completely standard method for the entire industry.
1 – Publishers are given a choice. They make it. It SHOULD NOT BE IMPORTANT to the consumer for what reasons the game is only in a certain launcher. If it’s so important to you that they signed a contract with Epic, why the hell aren’t you looking into other companies?? This is a common practice, but nooo, EGS BUY OUT games. EGS is not a platform for selling at all, but a platform for BUYING games. Well, it’s funny… The store offered conditions. The publisher considered it profitable and agreed. The decision is up to the publisher. Big shots go to Epic because they DARE to play without a losing scheme. And why should the consumer care if it costs him NOTHING?? Well that’s the truth. One extra icon? I heard scandals at school that were more interesting than here, considering how much dirt poured out of steam and everyone said “its fine”.
2 – ok, it’s my fault.
3 — I repeat: The store could exist without Fortnite. Generally easy. Setting up a store is not difficult. It’s difficult to promote it and this is where the window helps. And anyway, what are we talking about then?? The window helped and was good. If it weren’t for the window, we would have had the same EGS, but maybe later and more modestly.
4 – But you could buy games from Origin not only from EA. GoG has not only old games and games from projects. In this they are no different from Epics. Only Epic, unlike all the examples above, thought of creating attractive conditions for publishers. If this had happened during the time of Origin, the situation would have been absolutely similar.
5 – Because epics thought of something that other well-known launchers didn’t think of at all: to create favorable conditions for publishers. Before this, stupidly EVERYONE offered similar percentages. Except for some indie launchers, but here the song is different. Here’s your answer "why". The user does not play launchers. User plays games. If the launcher does not have a large base of customers, then publishers have no need to spend money on another launcher. So they’re leaving. Give it functionality similar to Steam, people will run there? No. What if it gets better? NO! People don’t want to GET AWAY. So we have to force.
This is the market and all theses seem to me just whining in the spirit of “they force us”. If they don’t force you, you’ll be eating garbage solutions from Steam for the rest of your life.To. “well, that’s where I have all the games. ». And is that good?? Tell me more about “fair competition”. In this case it is completely useless. Give people a cool launcher with tons of possibilities, they will have only one answer: “I have Steam”. What does it mean? It’s no longer a small library, the old-time “I’m used to it” and the patriotic “he’s saving PC gaming and I’m loyal to him.”!». Is it good? No t.To. this is stagnation of competition and EGS are the only ones who brazenly but confidently try to maintain the level of competitiveness in front of PUBLISHERS! The user, well, “will get used to it, expand his library and start saying that the EGS has given a second wind to PC gaming”.
So don’t be an old fart. You can also “get used to” hemorrhoids in the anus, but even if the treatment is VERY UNPLEASANT, it is necessary. And even if the doctor covers you with a three-story curse, the result and speed of rehabilitation are more important than “here, I’ll do everything carefully, slowly, if you don’t like something, tell me, I’ll stop.”. In the market, if you do this, EVEN WITHOUT HAVING COMPETITION, SOMEONE WILL RAPE YOU FOR THIS IS AN UNCONFIDENT POSITION IN THE MARKET WITH THE PURPOSE OF PLEASING THE CUSTOMER AND NOT EARNING NORMALLY TO INCREASE THE OPPORTUNITIES OF BOTH PLEASING CLIENTS AND EARNING MONEY!
OH GOD I’M SO TIRED OF THIS EGS CRAP OMG!
1. then the same complaint about Steam, Origin and Uplay. No big deal to drive to the EGS then. Each of them has a TON of products that can ONLY be purchased from them.
From the consumer’s point of view, you are like a hater of the conventional “Crossroads” t.To. they sell what your usual Pyaterochka does not sell.
2. They didn’t leave EGS. They blocked access to the site.To. there was an urgent need to return the old page, and this is the least of the possible problems. There’s not even a “understand it completely”!"and" think!». The page belongs to Epic. The publisher does not have access to it. Page removed EPICS. The publisher didn’t go anywhere. Now, if the page had not been returned, then yes.
3. Even BEFORE Fortnite they had this shit. THINK! YOU COULD FIND OUT ABOUT THIS! True, it was even narrower and was promoted by Anrial Tornament in open alpha and open access to the AnrialEngen4 engine. They could have screwed up without Fortnite, BUT Fortnite gave them a HUGE base for successfully opening a store. If we had followed earlier, the song with the song from Bethesda would have been repeated. The truth is not so deplorable.To. kamon. Open anrial4. This is already more than what Bethesda has. Well, we are not interested in their financial side. And shouldn’t be of interest at all. Running a store is not difficult. It’s difficult to promote it without losing popularity. They acted smartly and are expanding it without significant risks.
4. Not only. Origin competed openly. All sorts of “tweets” don’t mean anything. Origin had a library of more than just their projects. As a result, they went to their t.To. cheaper and no need to bother with discounts. Stupidly openly "beaten".
If we use analogies, then EGS is like a frail guy who came to the shooting range of pumped up guys. He can mature and pump up. He has every chance. A guy with a knife has no chance against a bullet.
5. Criticism of EGS is often absurd. I’m not against criticism, but I rarely see sensible. With a basket – smart. With politics – no. Well Riley. Do you want them to be on an equal footing?? Then the EGS should present something new. What? AND HERE IS NOTHING! Steam has a lot of functionality and it only proved that few people are interested in it. Origin was the first to introduce refunds? Steam stole the origin from nothing. Uplay for achievements gives you points for which you can get a 20% discount on whatever you want? Steam has more sales going on. Well here’s how to compete? Here’s Riley, your ideas? I don’t see any options at all. Well, none. Steam is trying not only to be a more profitable solution compared to other PC competitors, but also to say “PC gaming is not expensive” by attracting console players. There can be no fair competition here. Physically. You have to forcefully attract attention.To. Origin and Uplay had really great features, good design and something that could attract new people. And these people “pfft, stim dear” and that’s it. Well, here’s how to fight here? EGS found a way. Even if you throw shit at them, this is a reasonable way and the fact that “I’m too lazy to go to the intersection across the road when I’m used to going to the next five” is something on the level of fucking patriotism.
If a person has at least ONE launcher besides Steam, the lion’s share of claims are frankly two-faced and based on “THEY DECLARED!». And if Steam declares that the players are bastards, you will leave their site? That’s what I’m talking about. Very convenient double standards.
Have pre-orders been cancelled?? A friend bought it from me and received his copy.
And as for the rest of the article – so many people, so many opinions. I won’t argue, although I don’t share this point of view at all.
First, Epic Games are enriching themselves through the barbaric exploitation of Fortnite developers. And that in itself is terrible. Secondly, Epic Games decided to compete with Valve by luring publishers and developers, imposing on players a service that is objectively inferior to Steam in many respects. Thirdly, EGS continues to pursue policies that cause an extremely negative reaction among a significant part of the gaming community. Well, let the conclusions be yours. Thank you for your attention! First, Epic Games are enriching themselves through the barbaric exploitation of Fortnite developers. And that in itself is terrible. Secondly, Epic Games decided to compete with Valve by luring publishers and developers, imposing on players a service that is objectively inferior to Steam in many respects. Thirdly, EGS continues to pursue policies that cause an extremely negative reaction among a significant part of the gaming community. Well, let the conclusions be yours. Thank you for your attention!
1 – Not a launcher problem. You never know what conditions other launcher holders are in and what they live on. It’s not just Epics who have crunches, and they’re not the only ones who hold launchers thanks to internal sales of the games they crunch on.
2 – How else to lure them away? Ubisoft and Origin publish their own projects and this is the only thing that keeps their services afloat. Epic’s decision is logical. Plus, Steam has been making features for YEARS and YEARS, smoothly introducing many features so that people don’t get confused. You can’t do “the same thing and no worse”.To. there’s too much of everything that people will need to explain right away and it’s not a fact that they will use it.
3 — Most people don’t want to think sensibly and understand the need for competition.
Plus, the situation with the sale is more than clear: Epic made a real sale and said that there are regional scenes. In the end, they did everything without discounts for the region, but the developers got a kick out of the fact that it turns out that they themselves had to talk about the price threshold in specific regions. As a result: players received games at discounts in the first two days and will receive a version with a discount later (but not so severe), and the developers of the epic were compensated for everything. The conflict is over. Most likely, both sides are to blame, BUT THEY SOLVED THE PROBLEM HEALTHY.
Therefore, I don’t understand many problems. Epic Store is making headway. This is fine. NOT ONE launcher, in the first years of life, was good. I repeat NOT ONE! And the culture of buying out projects is borderline ridiculous. Steam has exclusives, GoG, Origin, Uplay, even God forgive me, DISCORD seems to have exclusives. Some of this is for my projects, but why the fuck should I, as a player, care?? Yes, and they offer conditions, and don’t stupidly buy the hell out of the publisher, his family and friends and, putting a gun to their head, declare “you are now ours.”!». This is a mutual deal with certain winnings for everyone. Especially now, when the project is gaining momentum and Epic is pouring money into temporary exclusivity in order to compensate for some of the losses from sales.
Players have the same horseradish Origin, Uplay, Steam and GoG. They won’t die from one more launcher. If people wanted to have a minimum of everything on their desk, they would not download new Internet browsers, players, software for office work. In Windows everything is already there. Yes, it works better for others, but there were enough of these “others” for us to come to this. The fact that this happens with Launchers is not bad at all.
Well, for those who say “Epic Games spit in my soul and in general they have a bad attitude towards consumers!» Let me remind you about the six-month technical support of Steam, the long introduction of rules for returning the game until the Origin came, immediately including it in itself, Artifact, ignoring numerous complaints about the servers before sales, combining ancient design elements that work poorly with new ones, and so on and so forth. “but it’s there” is equivalent to a Windows starter package. Well, what, there too, “but everything is there”. True, then everyone sculpts something of their own. Same with Steam. Forums? I use the site. Community? very crooked bullshit that was only properly shoveled once. Groups? Yes, apart from trade groups, no one really lives much. They stupidly rely on recommendations and this is a convenient feature… which comes out later than recommendations from their off-site resources that you already follow.
It’s true, Steam is not a bad service. The only good thing about it is its popularity, discounts and opportunities that many people don’t take advantage of.To. not comfortable. Competition is necessary, otherwise it will turn out like consoles, which have become more convenient to do right now. No, so what?. PS2 also had the ability to use a browser. Only on PS4 it became possible to use it normally. Why so long? Well, let the people rejoice in simple things. Epics follow the same path. Simple things are introduced smoothly. But at least their current ones work well right away. Few people remember the period of Steam, when the purchase was not made the first time, the game did not immediately appear in the library, the servers downloaded the game at browser speed and in general it was a monster. Yes, it’s a problem of time, but it was a hell of a road to go through anyway.
And the problems of Fortnite are only a matter of Fortnite itself. The epics, after all, don’t stupidly live off of him. For a second, they hold the most famous game engines, on the royalties of which you can run a store and play billiards in the office at lunchtime. Previously it could have been half a day, of course, but that’s how it is. Important Note.
Well, I understand the concerns, to be honest. However, it is worth noting that due to the peculiarities of the market, we will get literally several players and the situation will be similar to the current one, where there is Origin and Uplay, which simply have not only their own games. Fortunately, another player may not be added in the near future. And Yubiki willingly sells games for other launchers. If EA joins, there will be less contact with unnecessary launchers and thank God.
We’ll see, of course, but even when chasing publishers, buyers will still be pleased.To. in any store, even a grocery store, customers are attracted by the product and the quality of the store itself. If even one point sag, the store may collapse. If they start to forget about consumers… well… some stores will die. But because of competition, someone will become more attractive to users. Perhaps the same Steam will be updated more often, will have new features and will generally prove that he is a dad. Yes I’m all for it! I hate all other launchers, as long as they start at least some kind of race and at least some browser becomes the most convenient and fun for me =3
Everything would be fine, but it seems to me that people are losing sight of the most important thing. Nowadays many games are cooperative. Steam servers are, in my opinion, the best thing that has ever happened in terms of cooperative gaming on PC. Many projects were simply raised from oblivion. Therefore, often you don’t just need to buy a game, but you need to agree with your family and friends where to buy it in order to play together. Plus, I’m sure it’s natural that you want all the games in one place. And today this place belongs to the vast majority – Steam. Even purely by inertia, even a little more expensive, people will buy on Steam just so that everything is in one place along with all the powerful service.
It seems to me that there are almost no such socially phobic gamers anymore. Now the process of the game is communication and discussion and reading reviews and streams and videos and new friends. Steam has it all. Where else is this at the same level, I haven’t seen it yet.
And what of this is disputed by 12%??
As for Discord, he is an example of how EGS would live without exclusivity and regular PR. As we see – no way. The store is extremely reluctant to replenish itself even with indie projects.
1 – I didn’t teach you how to use it correctly. I didn’t even mention the actual use. I just emphasized that a number of theses have no weight against the very fact of having a launcher and their policies. I don’t deny that its functionality is small and therefore may not be convenient. Plus, maybe I just don’t like it. I accept this position quite calmly and do not dispute it anywhere.
2 – they didn’t even claim that they were BETTER. They offer an alternative and want competition. T.e. using your analogy, a diner says it wants to become a restaurant. Their right. Let them try. Time will judge everyone. And why the hell should someone’s words float on Twitter?? The product should be judged, not what someone said.
3 – I’m talking about “competition is needed” and you’re talking about “competition is needed, but everyone is fine as is”. Cool.
1(4) – shouldn’t we judge a store by THEIR product, and not by the PRODUCT ITSELF??
3(5) – there was and is money. Opening a store is not that expensive. Discord, GoG and a number of indie launchers only prove this. It’s hard to support him. I didn’t say he would be the same. Just the opposite. I would be completely different. But they had the opportunity and they could have done it without any problems. Even with the same promise of interest. But there would be much less sense.
5(6) — Even before the action you have to think about it. If they remove the low percentage for the publisher, they will die. But I don’t like to vanish.
About Choice, I don’t even understand if I took everything from this quote, so I’ll repeat: I don’t teach you how to use launchers. If you don’t like something, for God’s sake. Don’t take it. I just don’t see the point in whining “but then I won’t play their exclusive”. The excuse for Origin that “these are their games” is also strangely wrong, since we are talking about “whether you like the launcher or not”. If I DO NOT like the EA launcher, as well as the EGS launcher, for me, as a consumer, they are of the same breed. They may have games that I want to play, but I don’t like the launcher and it turns out I need to strangle my pride and step over the launcher.
OOOOOH. Let’s cut the canvases? I will briefly state my position:
NOT liking a launcher for reasons of taste and functionality is normal. However, in this vein, he is no more special than Origin.To. there are a number of projects that require contact with him. The game is important to me, but I also put up with what publisher it is from and what launcher it uses.
NOT liking the launcher because they have their own policy and someone said something unnecessary is strange. We evaluate the product. The inner kitchen is important for the filling of this product. Therefore, it confuses me that people use theses, which often affect the internal kitchen, and not the final product. YES HE HAS PROBLEMS, but the problems are popular and which many have already had. The fact that this is being made into some kind of UNIQUE SPIT IN THE FACE is embarrassing. If a person says “it’s not convenient for me” or “it bothered me”, I won’t even argue. He’s right! But the fact that “THEY ARE USING TEMPORARY EXCLUSIVITY IS A GODLESS POLICY” is laughter and nothing more.
If you ask my opinion on the launcher: very nice, but not the most convenient. Tweaking a number of things that they have already promised and purely by design is very suitable. In any case, Steam won’t replace me stupidly because of the tactic “I’ll buy the game in 1-2 years on sale,” but if it’s more profitable there, I’ll buy it there. Like I did with Uplay.
Everyone jerks off as they want. Just blame the store’s policy, saying how bad it is… when no one forces the publisher to stick to the same Steam, or the situation with the sale, the incidents of which have happened on Steam more than once… debatable.
Well, okay, I’ll say something negative about the Unified State System so that I won’t be considered its holy defender. The policy of gradually introducing design solutions and functionality is idiotic. Nobody rushed them. Well, it would be possible to at least make a normal basket! It’s funny! You are not BattleNet, where there are a minimum of games, people need to navigate this way! Of course, I liked their design and I consider the lion’s share of Steam features to be poorly implemented… BUT NOT HAVE ACHIEVEMENTS AT START. Well, honestly, you should be ashamed of this. BattleNet has achievements inside games. They can be forgiven. GoG had achievements at the beta stage! GoG.
Wow. I think the balance has been restored a little.
I don’t understand the depth of the drama surrounding the Epic Store. They do exactly what they should to develop their site. It would be strange and even somewhat criminal if they did not do this.
And the fact that this causes a certain discomfort among consumers is a systemic problem. This is how it basically works now.
GOG has really tasty offers for old games + there is a moment that, although not quickly, they are adding our localization. Also their trick is that the games are optimized for new computers. I bought several games there seriously cheaper than on Steam and am happy as an elephant)
Everything ends someday. Others have been “playing with exclusivity” for a very long time and continue to this day. There’s no end in sight. Why not try this company, since they have such an opportunity??
But the fact of the matter is that the launcher works and a number of its problems may not concern me. ALL the problems in Fallout 76 affect me, even if I just want to walk along the road.
Let’s call it quits? I’m already tired of nitpicking about my words (I was already trying to close the topic, when suddenly “OH YOU SAID SOMETHING ABOUT THE LAUNCHER AGAIN!"… I already feel a pang in my chest from the fact that the conversation ALWAYS deviates from what I want to say and inappropriate analogies are used..
Bingo! ) “After all, if you can’t see the difference, why pay more” ©
There is no point in trying to catch up, but you can pretend to try. And then… who knows what will happen next. This is all at the start. If it burns out, they will start improving. It won’t burn out – at least they didn’t spend money on it.
Players are willing to pay for raw and frankly shoddy products. They are even ready to buy a pig in a poke long before the cat is put there. A lot of players don’t understand to whom and for what money is paid in these services. No understanding of consumer rights. No sense of self. To exaggerate, people stand with money in their hands and wait for this very money to be taken from them. All that remains is to promise them how great everything will be, and then trade with them for at least something. This is not only in the gaming industry, in principle, generations of marketers and optimizers have tried in commodity-money relations. (Here, of course, it should be added that the bulk of the population is slowly becoming poor and they simply do not agree to pay for a quality product, but we need to go very deep there, and this is not about EGS at all) Even if the company’s goal is to release and promote only high-quality games and provide good service, it will still, to one degree or another, resort to this, because it is impossible to achieve such a goal without fulfilling the primary task – making money. In principle, any goal in a commercial enterprise cannot be achieved without making money.
Epic Games is trying today. Tomorrow Zenimax or some Disney will come and do the same.
Getting dressed means developing. The fact that he does this naked at the ball is a problem of primary idiocy)
The success of EGS through hate can lead to a sea of shit? It’s better to do it all at once, rather than little by little, little by little, as was done before. If not immediately, but it can have a positive effect. I don’t mind swimming in shit so that I can forget for the rest of my life what it’s like to accidentally step on it. I’m exaggerating the OFC, but the position is simple: a bad precedent in the market is better than no precedent at all. Any movement is the pulse of the market. There will be a decline, there will be growth. As well as vice versa. I have no idea when this will happen, no idea who will close due to this recession, but it’s more interesting and useful than sitting on Steam for decades, visiting Uplay and Origin from time to time. If something like this has to happen to change this situation, even through bad launchers and the arrogance of publishers, I’m all for it.
One way or another, this is a somewhat unique experience in the gaming industry. I’m glad this is happening at all. And that GoG decided to make a launcher for launchers. And that Steam began to redesign EVERYTHING and not just one page. To be honest, I don’t care whether EGS has any merit in all this. Overall, I’m glad that this year there is a movement in launchers that hasn’t happened since the advent of GoG, and that’s at least 5 years ago.
1 – I want to support the developer. The percentage of support is the second most important thing for me. The first importance is ease of purchase. If nothing goes to the developer 100% (they fell apart, left the publisher), then the torrent.
2 — EGS doesn’t stop me from playing.
3 – because I evaluate the product in relation to “interest-price” and wait for them to converge. Better this way than nothing.
I, as a consumer, don’t care if the publisher rubs me in or the store. As I said above, the main thing is ease of purchase. EGS is now more convenient for me than Uplay, for example.
And I should want games from Epic? It’s like you’re pulling me out of the topic of conversation on which I’m in some provocative distance. I expressed everything I wanted, and you are openly digging into me. I’m not tired of it myself?
Quite a sensible comment from me.To. It’s quite objective that we spend more time in games than in launchers. If not, then I don’t know something about launchers ._.
I read it, but I still don’t understand why Steam is a garbage dump. You list Dotan, hooks to Pudge. All this is not the same. There seem to be 35k games there besides Dothan. And before our crisis with the ruble, much could be snatched up for pennies. I remember buying all sorts of Gothic and Fallout packs for like 30-50 rubles… Now there is no such will there. But there are huge opportunities for cooperation, stable servers, fairly objective opinions on games, for each game the community posts guides, patches, cracks… It’s a beauty in my opinion. 5$ is the price of some indie game, linking the phone is in your interests, not theirs… As for me, everything is great on Steam. There are complaints, but they are more likely about the fact that our ruble has depreciated by half + this coincided with the general tightening of Steam’s discount policy in general, but that’s another story… If we compare STim and EGS, then I liked the phrase of one network user: “Comparing Steam and EGS is like comparing a comfortable house with a pissing place behind the garages.”.